Abortion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Abortion - Essay Example These untruths have been widely perceived as facts. In addition, the Founding Fathers of this nation intended to shape not only the legal but the moral direction of American society as well when they drafted the Constitution, the document that defines the laws of the nation. If they were alive today, the Founders clearly would be against the killing of innocent victims for reasons of convenience. There is little freedom of choice for women who are experiencing an unwanted pregnancy. The women themselves usually wish to bring their baby to full term. Other powerful influences in her life such as husbands/boyfriends, parents and friends are generally the forces that exact pressures on her to terminate the pregnancy. â€Å"Eight out of 10 women surveyed after abortion said they would have given birth if they’d had support and encouragement from family and friends† (Reardon, 2002). It’s the abortion that, in many cases, is unwanted by the woman, not the baby. Most often, the father of the child, not wishing to accept responsibility, may beg or even threaten a woman until she agrees to the abortion. â€Å"In 95 percent of all cases the male partner played a central role in the decision† (Zimmerman, 1977). This and other studies have illustrated clearly that most women decide against their own conscience. Legal abortion enables fathers to force their will on mothers. Some women resort to abortion in desperation because they fear continued abuse. That fear is substantiated as women who refuse to abort have been subjected to serious abuses which have escalated to murder if the women still persists in her refusal. Murder is the leading cause of death for pregnant women and for what other motive could there be? â€Å"Sixty-four percent of women surveyed report being pressured by others into unwanted abortions† (Reardon, 1992).   Ã‚  Immediately following an abortion, the one(s)

College Goals Essay Example for Free

College Goals Essay Attending college is the first step to a better future. Throughout life there will be many goals to accomplish but some of the most important goals to accomplish will be during the time you are in college. My first goal is to pass every class this semester. After completing this goal my next goal to complete will be to graduate from Hudson County Community College with an Associate’s Degree in Liberal Arts. Finally my last goal to complete is to further my education and get the job I want. Passing every class this semester will help me feel positive and confident about my future and future goals. In order to complete this goal I will have to attend every class and be on time. By missing one class I will miss out on a lot of work and may not be able to catch up. I will have to finish every assignment on time because if I write the best essay I could possibly write but hand it in late, my grade will drop dramatically. Finally I will have to ask for help if I need it. Even though it is my first semester of college and I do not know what to expect, asking for help is easy and can help improve my college experience. To be able to obtain my Associate’s Degree in Liberal Arts by August 2015 I will have to work harder than I ever have. I will have to be sure to complete all my assignments and be sure to attend all my classes. I will have to put school first in life and avoid activities that will have a negative impact on my education. Prior to achieving this goal I also want to choose the career I want so I can know what direction my life is going. My final long-term college goal is to go on to obtain my Bachelor’s Degree and possibly my Master’s Degree, depending on the career I choose. I have not chosen the career I want yet but I want to have the best education possible to qualify me for the job. To be able to obtain the best education possible I want to keep my grade point average high and be able to attend a good university. I have not really thought about all the details since I have not chosen a career yet but I am going to better my education as much as I possibly can. After completing all my education I will have the job I want and be happy and financially stable. In conclusion, my college goals are some of the most important in my life because they greatly help shape my future. By passing all my classes this semester I will have the confidence to continue my education and do well. By obtaining my Associate’s Degree I will be able to go on and obtain my Bachelor’s and possibly Master’s Degrees. And finally when I finish completing all my education I will be able to get the career I want and be happy with my life. My entire future depends on the choices I make in college.

Training for improving service quality at Honda Essay Example for Free

Training for improving service quality at Honda Essay This case is about Honda American Motor Company which tries to improve quality due to blended learning approach. They split it in three different phase. 1. Phase one: The first phase takes place online. For two to three weeks, learners access a series of online modules that introduce the logical processes for effective problem solving and decision making. Learner progress is essentially self-paced, but since the content is driven from a Web server, the instructor can follow the progress of each learner and provide on-going encouragement and support. During phase one, learners are also asked to identify situations to which they intend to apply the techniques so they can focus on these situations when they attend the workshop. This powerful combination of initial learning and preparation for applying the concepts to real-life issues ensures the following phase will not only be efficient but also build deep understanding and significant motivation to use the ideas on the job after training. 2. Phase two: The second phase takes place at the workshop. Guided by the instructor, learners spend two days deepening their understanding of the concepts, discussing best practices and additional techniques for problem solving and decision making, and practicing on detailed case scenarios. Since skill transfer and results occur most rapidly when starting with the learner’s on-the-job issues, a significant portion of the session is spent working on the problems, decisions and plans identified in phase one. Simultaneously, learners receive coaching and feedback from the instructor and one another. Learners leave the session ready to fully apply the concepts and with a plan in hand to move successfully from the workshop to consistent use of the concepts back on the job. 3. Phase three: The final phase takes place back online. In the three weeks following the session, learners resolve the on-the-job issues they began to work on during the workshop. They document for instructor review, feedback and approval the specific techniques they used to resolve the issues. During phase three, learners have access to a host of online support tools and information. They can contact the instructor with questions at any time. The goal of this phase is to ensure use of the learned concepts and build  confidence. Advantages of Honda’s blended learning approach Quality of individual output is improved. Employees have the same way of thinking and working - Makes it easier to work with manager and all the co-workers. Deep understanding and strong motivation from the employees Personalized support Reduce their time away from the job Take advantages of expanding technology capabilities and infrastructure Assure tangible transfer of skills Format which best support the overall emphasis on growth and quality Questions After the presentation of our case some questions have been asked by the students of the class. We have discussed about them and tried to bring some explanations. There were different kinds of questions. The first kind was about the learning model itself. The main questions were the followings: 1. How can you measure the quality improvements? Overall and in figures? 2. Is the learning time too short? 3. Can you find in the library some video clips? 4. Is it not to theoretical this learning system? For the first one we think that it is really difficult to measure in term of figure this kind of program. Indeed it is not a small part of Honda’s employees that are training but the whole company. In addition it is not a program for the short term but for the long term. The global quality of Hondo production will increase due to the learning program that means that the customers will be more satisfy. In the long run they will come back to the company to buy their next car. It will take years to quantify the real impact on the turnover. However it is possible to conduct some survey to the customer to know if they think that the quality has improved. The company  can also check if the time to make a car decrease or if there are less failure with the production. For the second one we do not think that the learning time is too short. 6 weeks is enough for this time of training. Moreover it is not because you have done it one time that you cannot do it anymore in the future. With a short training you can be focused on the main point and do not lose time on secondary information that the employee will never use. For the third one we do not know if it is already available on the intranet of Honda. But it can be a really good idea if it does not exist yet. People prefer to watch somebody explaining something (and see how it is working) than only read it in a book. The last one if one of the most important question for this kind of program where you mix theoretical and manual learning. Where is the border between too much of one or the other? At the first view it seems that two days of practice is not enough. However when the employee start is manual formation he has already learned lots of information. So the trainer will not lose lots of time to explain easy and obvious things but can be directly focus on the main important information that the trainee must learn. The second kind of question was more about the employees and their interaction with the learning program. The following questions have been asked to us: 1. How can you motivate the employees, with which kinds of incentives? 2. What about the learners who are not ready after phase 2? 3. What are the interactions among the employees? By participating into an important process in order to improve the quality of their company, the worker feels involved and useful. Indeed, its not sufficient for the most part. Regarding to the low wages that the workers can perceived, a money incentive can be a real motivation to make them want to learn. Moreover, they can motivate them by establishing in the company policy, a rule that explain that if the worker is efficient and provides good work quickly, he can whether be promoted or get bonus in the end of each month. The answer of the second question is quite simple. Indeed, the instructors  can easily evaluate the learners by watching him doing the job. If the learner applies the method perfectly, the instructor will give him the permission to go to the next phase. Otherwise, according to his level of difficulties, the instructor will send him either in the first phase or remake the second phase. Employees interact each other every time (within the company, lunch breaks), but also on the intranet through forums or instant messages. Thus, they can talk easily about working problems, or for instance, share tips and solutions about technical problems. Every single solution is directly saved into the database. Lot of communication channels allows workers to interact easily each other. How does Honda doing compare to its competitors? First of all it is a really complex process to compare sales and figures with quality management. As we learned during the lecture there is no guaranteed effect between sales of products, Stock price progress and quality. Therefore it is even challenging for Managers to analyze the effects of quality improvements. In ours point of view there is one obvious point how to compare it. The annual recalls of Cars. Toyota US 2013 (Toyota US, 2014 Reuters, 2014) Cars Sold: 182’152 Cars Recall â€Å"Nearly 19 million vehicles globally from late 2009 to early 2011 due to unintended acceleration claims.† Honda US 2013 (IBT, 2014 Reuters, 2014) Cars Sold: 135’255 Cars Recall â€Å"Between 2008 and 2011, Honda was forced to recall about 2.8 million vehicles after finding a defect with driver-side airbags supplied by Takata.†  « Honda (2.8 million), Hyundai-Kia (2.2 million) and Ford Motor Co. (1.2 million) rounded out the top five in terms of vehicles recalled in 2013.  » Conclusion To conclude, this system of training in three phases has many advantages. It permits to all employees to feel involved in it because it is not only a theoretical learning system, to have a personalized support and a control at each phase permit to really evaluate their progression. Furthermore this system of training allows them to reduce their time away from their job. We have analysed some questions about this system such as the measurement of the quality improvement because we can’t really quantify the real impact on the turnover now. The project is on the long term and it will take some few years to measure the satisfaction of the customer, if they will buy another car of this brand or not. The other questions were about employees and their interaction with the program. The money is not the only motivation for employees; they are also motivated by the self-satisfaction (increase their knowledge, promotion, or belong to a company of quality). This program permits the skills transfer also, to discuss of problems on the intranet (forums) Despite some â€Å"issues† such as measuring the efficiency right now of this system or the non-guarantee of effect between sales of product, stock price progress and quality; Honda is the company with the lowest annual recalls of cars. Bibliography IBT http://www.ibtimes.com/here-are-december-2013-big-eight-us-auto-sales-numbers-gm-ford-chrysler-toyota-honda-nissan-1525492, 16.04.2014 Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/11/us-toyota-recall-idUSBRE93A04D20130411, 16.04.2014 Toyota US http://toyotanews.pressroom.toyota.com/releases/tms+march+2014+sales+chart.htm, 16.04.2014

Credit Risk Dissertation

Credit Risk Dissertation CREDIT RISK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The future of banking will undoubtedly rest on risk management dynamics. Only those banks that have efficient risk management system will survive in the market in the long run. The major cause of serious banking problems over the years continues to be directly related to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties, poor portfolio risk management, or a lack of attention to deterioration in the credit standing of a banks counterparties. Credit risk is the oldest and biggest risk that bank, by virtue of its very nature of business, inherits. This has however, acquired a greater significance in the recent past for various reasons. There have been many traditional approaches to measure credit risk like logit, linear probability model but with passage of time new approaches have been developed like the Credit+, KMV Model. Basel I Accord was introduced in 1988 to have a framework for regulatory capital for banks but the â€Å"one size fit all† approach led to a shift, to a new and comprehensive approach -Basel II which adopts a three pillar approach to risk management. Banks use a number of techniques to mitigate the credit risks to which they are exposed. RBI has prescribed adoption of comprehensive approach for the purpose of CRM which allows fuller offset of security of collateral against exposures by effectively reducing the exposure amount by the value ascribed to the collateral. In this study, a leading nationalized bank is taken to study the steps taken by the bank to implement the Basel- II Accord and the entire framework developed for credit risk management. The bank under the study uses the credit scoring method to evaluate the credit risk involved in various loans/advances. The bank has set up special software to evaluate each case under various parameters and a monitoring system to continuously track each assets performance in accordance with the evaluation parameters. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Rationale Credit Risk Management in todays deregulated market is a big challenge. Increased market volatility has brought with it the need for smart analysis and specialized applications in managing credit risk. A well defined policy framework is needed to help the operating staff identify the risk-event, assign a probability to each, quantify the likely loss, assess the acceptability of the exposure, price the risk and monitor them right to the point where they are paid off. Generally, Banks in India evaluate a proposal through the traditional tools of project financing, computing maximum permissible limits, assessing management capabilities and prescribing a ceiling for an industry exposure. As banks move in to a new high powered world of financial operations and trading, with new risks, the need is felt for more sophisticated and versatile instruments for risk assessment, monitoring and controlling risk exposures. It is, therefore, time that banks managements equip them fully to grapple with the demands of creating tools and systems capable of assessing, monitoring and controlling risk exposures in a more scientific manner. According to an estimate, Credit Risk takes about 70% and 30% remaining is shared between the other two primary risks, namely Market risk (change in the market price and operational risk i.e., failure of internal controls, etc.). Quality borrowers (Tier-I borrowers) were able to access the capital market directly without going through the debt route. Hence, the credit route is now more open to lesser mortals (Tier-II borrowers). With margin levels going down, banks are unable to absorb the level of loan losses. Even in banks which regularly fine-tune credit policies and streamline credit processes, it is a real challenge for credit risk managers to correctly identify pockets of risk concentration, quantify extent of risk carried, identify opportunities for diversification and balance the risk-return trade-off in their credit portfolio. The management of banks should strive to embrace the notion of ‘uncertainty and risk in their balance sheet and instill the need for approaching credit administration from a ‘risk-perspective across the system by placing well drafted strategies in the hands of the operating staff with due material support for its successful implementation. There is a need for Strategic approach to Credit Risk Management (CRM) in Indian Commercial Banks, particularly in view of; (1) Higher NPAs level in comparison with global benchmark (2) RBI s stipulation about dividend distribution by the banks (3) Revised NPAs level and CAR norms (4) New Basel Capital Accord (Basel -II) revolution 1.2 OBJECTIVES To understand the conceptual framework for credit risk. To understand credit risk under the Basel II Accord. To analyze the credit risk management practices in a Leading Nationalised Bank 1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research Design: In order to have more comprehensive definition of the problem and to become familiar with the problems, an extensive literature survey was done to collect secondary data for the location of the various variables, probably contemporary issues and the clarity of concepts. Data Collection Techniques: The data collection technique used is interviewing. Data has been collected from both primary and secondary sources. Primary Data: is collected by making personal visits to the bank. Secondary Data: The details have been collected from research papers, working papers, white papers published by various agencies like ICRA, FICCI, IBA etc; articles from the internet and various journals. 1.4 LITERATURE REVIEW * Merton (1974) has applied options pricing model as a technology to evaluate the credit risk of enterprise, it has been drawn a lot of attention from western academic and business circles.Mertons Model is the theoretical foundation of structural models. Mertons model is not only based on a strict and comprehensive theory but also used market information stock price as an important variance toevaluate the credit risk.This makes credit risk to be a real-time monitored at a much higher frequency.This advantage has made it widely applied by the academic and business circle for a long time. Other Structural Models try to refine the original Merton Framework by removing one or more of unrealistic assumptions. * Black and Cox (1976) postulate that defaults occur as soon as firms asset value falls below a certain threshold. In contrast to the Merton approach, default can occur at any time. The paper by Black and Cox (1976) is the first of the so-called First Passage Models (FPM). First passage models specify default as the first time the firms asset value hits a lower barrier, allowing default to take place at any time. When the default barrier is exogenously fixed, as in Black and Cox (1976) and Longstaff and Schwartz (1995), it acts as a safety covenant to protect bondholders. Black and Cox introduce the possibility of more complex capital structures, with subordinated debt. * Geske (1977) introduces interest-paying debt to the Merton model. * Vasicek (1984) introduces the distinction between short and long term liabilities which now represents a distinctive feature of the KMV model. Under these models, all the relevant credit risk elements, including default and recovery at default, are a function of the structural characteristics of the firm: asset levels, asset volatility (business risk) and leverage (financial risk). * Kim, Ramaswamy and Sundaresan (1993) have suggested an alternative approach which still adopts the original Merton framework as far as the default process is concerned but, at the same time, removes one of the unrealistic assumptions of the Merton model; namely, that default can occur only at maturity of the debt when the firms assets are no longer sufficient to cover debt obligations. Instead, it is assumed that default may occur anytime between the issuance and maturity of the debt and that default is triggered when the value of the firms assets reaches a lower threshold level. In this model, the RR in the event of default is exogenous and independent from the firms asset value. It is generally defined as a fixed ratio of the outstanding debt value and is therefore independent from the PD. The attempt to overcome the shortcomings of structural-form models gave rise to reduced-form models. Unlike structural-form models, reduced-form models do not condition default on the value of the firm, and parameters related to the firms value need not be estimated to implement them. * Jarrow and Turnbull (1995) assumed that, at default, a bond would have a market value equal to an exogenously specified fraction of an otherwise equivalent default-free bond. * Duffie and Singleton (1999) followed with a model that, when market value at default (i.e. RR) is exogenously specified, allows for closed-form solutions for the term-structure of credit spreads. * Zhou (2001) attempt to combine the advantages of structural-form models a clear economic mechanism behind the default process, and the ones of reduced- form models unpredictability of default. This model links RRs to the firm value at default so that the variation in RRs is endogenously generated and the correlation between RRs and credit ratings reported first in Altman (1989) and Gupton, Gates and Carty (2000) is justified. Lately portfolio view on credit losses has emerged by recognising that changes in credit quality tend to comove over the business cycle and that one can diversify part of the credit risk by a clever composition of the loan portfolio across regions, industries and countries. Thus in order to assess the credit risk of a loan portfolio, a bank must not only investigate the creditworthiness of its customers, but also identify the concentration risks and possible comovements of risk factors in the portfolio. * CreditMetrics by Gupton et al (1997) was publicized in 1997 by JP Morgan. Its methodology is based on probability of moving from one credit quality to another within a given time horizon (credit migration analysis). The estimation of the portfolio Value-at-Risk due to Credit (Credit-VaR) through CreditMetrics A rating system with probabilities of migrating from one credit quality to another over a given time horizon (transition matrix) is the key component of the credit-VaR proposed by JP Morgan. The specified credit risk horizon is usually one year. A rating system with probabilities of migrating from one credit quality to another over a given time horizon (transition matrix) is the key component of the credit-VaR proposed by JP Morgan. The specified credit risk horizon is usually one year. * (Sy, 2007), states that the primary cause of credit default is loan delinquency due to insufficient liquidity or cash flow to service debt obligations. In the case of unsecured loans, we assume delinquency is a necessary and sufficient condition. In the case of collateralized loans, delinquency is a necessary, but not sufficient condition, because the borrower may be able to refinance the loan from positive equity or net assets to prevent default. In general, for secured loans, both delinquency and insolvency are assumed necessary and sufficient for credit default. CHAPTER 2 THEORECTICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 CREDIT RISK: Credit risk is risk due to uncertainty in a counterpartys (also called an obligors or credits) ability to meet its obligations. Because there are many types of counterparties—from individuals to sovereign governments—and many different types of obligations—from auto loans to derivatives transactions—credit risk takes many forms. Institutions manage it in different ways. Although credit losses naturally fluctuate over time and with economic conditions, there is (ceteris paribus) a statistically measured, long-run average loss level. The losses can be divided into two categories i.e. expected losses (EL) and unexpected losses (UL). EL is based on three parameters:  ·Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚   The likelihood that default will take place over a specified time horizon (probability of default or PD)  · â‚ ¬Ã‚  The amount owned by the counterparty at the moment of default (exposure at default or EAD)  ·Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚   The fraction of the exposure, net of any recoveries, which will be lost following a default event (loss given default or LGD). EL = PD x EAD x LGD EL can be aggregated at various different levels (e.g. individual loan or entire credit portfolio), although it is typically calculated at the transaction level; it is normally mentioned either as an absolute amount or as a percentage of transaction size. It is also both customer- and facility-specific, since two different loans to the same customer can have a very different EL due to differences in EAD and/or LGD. It is important to note that EL (or, for that matter, credit quality) does not by itself constitute risk; if losses always equaled their expected levels, then there would be no uncertainty. Instead, EL should be viewed as an anticipated â€Å"cost of doing business† and should therefore be incorporated in loan pricing and ex ante provisioning. Credit risk, in fact, arises from variations in the actual loss levels, which give rise to the so-called unexpected loss (UL). Statistically speaking, UL is simply the standard deviation of EL. UL= ÏÆ' (EL) = ÏÆ' (PD*EAD*LGD) Once the bank- level credit loss distribution is constructed, credit economic capital is simply determined by the banks tolerance for credit risk, i.e. the bank needs to decide how much capital it wants to hold in order to avoid insolvency because of unexpected credit losses over the next year. A safer bank must have sufficient capital to withstand losses that are larger and rarer, i.e. they extend further out in the loss distribution tail. In practice, therefore, the choice of confidence interval in the loss distribution corresponds to the banks target credit rating (and related default probability) for its own debt. As Figure below shows, economic capital is the difference between EL and the selected confidence interval at the tail of the loss distribution; it is equal to a multiple K (often referred to as the capital multiplier) of the standard deviation of EL (i.e. UL). The shape of the loss distribution can vary considerably depending on product type and borrower credit quality. For example, high quality (low PD) borrowers tend to have proportionally less EL per unit of capital charged, meaning that K is higher and the shape of their loss distribution is more skewed (and vice versa). Credit risk may be in the following forms: * In case of the direct lending * In case of the guarantees and the letter of the credit * In case of the treasury operations * In case of the securities trading businesses * In case of the cross border exposure 2.2 The need for Credit Risk Rating: The need for Credit Risk Rating has arisen due to the following: 1. With dismantling of State control, deregulation, globalisation and allowing things to shape on the basis of market conditions, Indian Industry and Indian Banking face new risks and challenges. Competition results in the survival of the fittest. It is therefore necessary to identify these risks, measure them, monitor and control them. 2. It provides a basis for Credit Risk Pricing i.e. fixation of rate of interest on lending to different borrowers based on their credit risk rating thereby balancing Risk Reward for the Bank. 3. The Basel Accord and consequent Reserve Bank of India guidelines requires that the level of capital required to be maintained by the Bank will be in proportion to the risk of the loan in Banks Books for measurement of which proper Credit Risk Rating system is necessary. 4. The credit risk rating can be a Risk Management tool for prospecting fresh borrowers in addition to monitoring the weaker parameters and taking remedial action. The types of Risks Captured in the Banks Credit Risk Rating Model The Credit Risk Rating Model provides a framework to evaluate the risk emanating from following main risk categorizes/risk areas: * Industry risk * Business risk * Financial risk * Management risk * Facility risk * Project risk 2.3 WHY CREDIT RISK MEASUREMENT? In recent years, a revolution is brewing in risk as it is both managed and measured. There are seven reasons as to why certain surge in interest: 1. Structural increase in bankruptcies: Although the most recent recession hit at different time in different countries, most statistics show a significant increase in bankruptcies, compared to prior recession. To the extent that there has been a permanent or structural increase in bankruptcies worldwide- due to increase in the global competition- accurate credit analysis become even more important today than in past. 2. Disintermediation: As capital markets have expanded and become accessible to small and mid sized firms, the firms or borrowers â€Å"left behind† to raise funds from banks and other traditional financial institutions (FIs) are likely to be smaller and to have weaker credit ratings. Capital market growth has produced â€Å"a winners† curse effect on the portfolios of traditional FIs. 3. More Competitive Margins: Almost paradoxically, despite the decline in the average quality of loans, interest margins or spreads, especially in wholesale loan markets have become very thin. In short, the risk-return trade off from lending has gotten worse. A number of reasons can be cited, but an important factor has been the enhanced competition for low quality borrowers especially from finance companies, much of whose lending activity has been concentrated at the higher risk/lower quality end of the market. 4. Declining and Volatile Values of Collateral: Concurrent with the recent Asian and Russian debt crisis in well developed countries such as Switzerland and Japan have shown that property and real assets value are very hard to predict, and to realize through liquidation. The weaker (and more uncertain) collateral values are, the riskier the lending is likely to be. Indeed the current concerns about deflation worldwide have been accentuated the concerns about the value of real assets such as property and other physical assets. 5. The Growth Of Off- Balance Sheet Derivatives: In many of the very large U.S. banks, the notional value of the off-balance-sheet exposure to instruments such as over-the-counter (OTC) swaps and forwards is more than 10 times the size of their loan books. Indeed the growth in credit risk off the balance sheet was one of the main reasons for the introduction, by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), of risk based capital requirements in 1993. Under the BIS system, the banks have to hold a capital requirement based on the mark- to- market current values of each OTC Derivative contract plus an add on for potential future exposure. 6. Technology Advances in computer systems and related advances in information technology have given banks and FIs the opportunity to test high powered modeling techniques. A survey conducted by International Swaps and Derivatives Association and the Institute of International Finance in 2000 found that survey participants (consisting of 25 commercial banks from 10 countries, with varying size and specialties) used commercial and internal databases to assess the credit risk on rated and unrated commercial, retail and mortgage loans. 7. The BIS Risk-Based Capital Requirements Despite the importance of above six reasons, probably the greatest incentive for banks to develop new credit risk models has been dissatisfaction with the BIS and central banks post-1992 imposition of capital requirements on loans. The current BIS approach has been described as a ‘one size fits all policy, irrespective of the size of loan, its maturity, and most importantly, the credit quality of the borrowing party. Much of the current interest in fine tuning credit risk measurement models has been fueled by the proposed BIS New Capital Accord (or so Called BIS II) which would more closely link capital charges to the credit risk exposure to retail, commercial, sovereign and interbank credits. Chapter- 3 Credit Risk Approaches and Pricing 3.1 CREDIT RISK MEASUREMENT APPROACHES: 1. CREDIT SCORING MODELS Credit Scoring Models use data on observed borrower characteristics to calculate the probability of default or to sort borrowers into different default risk classes. By selecting and combining different economic and financial borrower characteristics, a bank manager may be able to numerically establish which factors are important in explaining default risk, evaluate the relative degree or importance of these factors, improve the pricing of default risk, be better able to screen out bad loan applicants and be in a better position to calculate any reserve needed to meet expected future loan losses. To employ credit scoring model in this manner, the manager must identify objective economic and financial measures of risk for any particular class of borrower. For consumer debt, the objective characteristics in a credit -scoring model might include income, assets, age occupation and location. For corporate debt, financial ratios such as debt-equity ratio are usually key factors. After data are identified, a statistical technique quantifies or scores the default risk probability or default risk classification. Credit scoring models include three broad types: (1) linear probability models, (2) logit model and (3) linear discriminant model. LINEAR PROBABILITY MODEL: The linear probability model uses past data, such as accounting ratios, as inputs into a model to explain repayment experience on old loans. The relative importance of the factors used in explaining the past repayment performance then forecasts repayment probabilities on new loans; that is can be used for assessing the probability of repayment. Briefly we divide old loans (i) into two observational groups; those that defaulted (Zi = 1) and those that did not default (Zi = 0). Then we relate these observations by linear regression to s set of j casual variables (Xij) that reflects quantative information about the ith borrower, such as leverage or earnings. We estimate the model by linear regression of: Zi = ÃŽ £ÃŽ ²jXij + error Where ÃŽ ²j is the estimated importance of the jth variable in explaining past repayment experience. If we then take these estimated ÃŽ ²js and multiply them by the observed Xij for a prospective borrower, we can derive an expected value of Zi for the probability of repayment on the loan. LOGIT MODEL: The objective of the typical credit or loan review model is to replicate judgments made by loan officers, credit managers or bank examiners. If an accurate model could be developed, then it could be used as a tool for reviewing and classifying future credit risks. Chesser (1974) developed a model to predict noncompliance with the customers original loan arrangement, where non-compliance is defined to include not only default but any workout that may have been arranged resulting in a settlement of the loan less favorable to the tender than the original agreement. Chessers model, which was based on a technique called logit analysis, consisted of the following six variables. X1 = (Cash + Marketable Securities)/Total Assets X2 = Net Sales/(Cash + Marketable Securities) X3 = EBIT/Total Assets X4 = Total Debt/Total Assets X5 = Total Assets/ Net Worth X6 = Working Capital/Net Sales The estimated coefficients, including an intercept term, are Y = -2.0434 -5.24X1 + 0.0053X2 6.6507X3 + 4.4009X4 0.0791X5 0.1020X6 Chessers classification rule for above equation is If P> 50, assign to the non compliance group and If P≠¤50, assign to the compliance group. LINEAR DISCRIMINANT MODEL: While linear probability and logit models project a value foe the expected probability of default if a loan is made, discriminant models divide borrowers into high or default risk classes contingent on their observed characteristic (X). Altmans Z-score model is an application of multivariate Discriminant analysis in credit risk modeling. Financial ratios measuring probability, liquidity and solvency appeared to have significant discriminating power to separate the firm that fails to service its debt from the firms that do not. These ratios are weighted to produce a measure (credit risk score) that can be used as a metric to differentiate the bad firms from the set of good ones. Discriminant analysis is a multivariate statistical technique that analyzes a set of variables in order to differentiate two or more groups by minimizing the within-group variance and maximizing the between group variance simultaneously. Variables taken were: X1::Working Capital/ Total Asset X2: Retained Earning/ Total Asset X3: Earning before interest and taxes/ Total Asset X4: Market value of equity/ Book value of total Liabilities X5: Sales/Total Asset The original Z-score model was revised and modified several times in order to find the scoring model more specific to a particular class of firm. These resulted in the private firms Z-score model, non manufacturers Z-score model and Emerging Market Scoring (EMS) model. 3.2 New Approaches TERM STRUCTURE DERIVATION OF CREDIT RISK: One market based method of assessing credit risk exposure and default probabilities is to analyze the risk premium inherent in the current structure of yields on corporate debt or loans to similar risk-rated borrowers. Rating agencies categorize corporate bond issuers into at least seven major classes according to perceived credit quality. The first four ratings AAA, AA, A and BBB indicate investment quality borrowers. MORTALITY RATE APPROACH: Rather than extracting expected default rates from the current term structure of interest rates, the FI manager may analyze the historic or past default experience the mortality rates, of bonds and loans of a similar quality. Here p1is the probability of a grade B bond surviving the first year of its issue; thus 1 p1 is the marginal mortality rate, or the probability of the bond or loan dying or defaulting in the first year while p2 is the probability of the loan surviving in the second year and that it has not defaulted in the first year, 1-p2 is the marginal mortality rate for the second year. Thus, for each grade of corporate buyer quality, a marginal mortality rate (MMR) curve can show the historical default rate in any specific quality class in each year after issue. RAROC MODELS: Based on a banks risk-bearing capacity and its risk strategy, it is thus necessary — bearing in mind the banks strategic orientation — to find a method for the efficient allocation of capital to the banks individual siness areas, i.e. to define indicators that are suitable for balancing risk and return in a sensible manner. Indicators fulfilling this requirement are often referred to as risk adjusted performance measures (RAPM). RARORAC (risk adjusted return on risk adjusted capital, usually abbreviated as the most commonly found forms are RORAC (return on risk adjusted capital), Net income is taken to mean income minus refinancing cost, operating cost, and expected losses. It should now be the banks goal to maximize a RAPM indicator for the bank as a whole, e.g. RORAC, taking into account the correlation between individual transactions. Certain constraints such as volume restrictions due to a potential lack of liquidity and the maintenance of solvency based on economic and regulatory capital have to be observed in reaching this goal. From an organizational point of view, value and risk management should therefore be linked as closely as possible at all organizational levels. OPTION MODELS OF DEFAULT RISK (kmv model): KMV Corporation has developed a credit risk model that uses information on the stock prices and the capital structure of the firm to estimate its default probability. The starting point of the model is the proposition that a firm will default only if its asset value falls below a certain level, which is function of its liability. It estimates the asset value of the firm and its asset volatility from the market value of equity and the debt structure in the option theoretic framework. The resultant probability is called Expected default Frequency (EDF). In summary, EDF is calculated in the following three steps: i) Estimation of asset value and volatility from the equity value and volatility of equity return. ii) Calculation of distance from default iii) Calculation of expected default frequency Credit METRICS: It provides a method for estimating the distribution of the value of the assets n a portfolio subject to change in the credit quality of individual borrower. A portfolio consists of different stand-alone assets, defined by a stream of future cash flows. Each asset has a distribution over the possible range of future rating class. Starting from its initial rating, an asset may end up in ay one of the possible rating categories. Each rating category has a different credit spread, which will be used to discount the future cash flows. Moreover, the assets are correlated among themselves depending on the industry they belong to. It is assumed that the asset returns are normally distributed and change in the asset returns causes the change in the rating category in future. Finally, the simulation technique is used to estimate the value distribution of the assets. A number of scenario are generated from a multivariate normal distribution, which is defined by the appropriate credit spread, t he future value of asset is estimated. CREDIT Risk+: CreditRisk+, introduced by Credit Suisse Financial Products (CSFP), is a model of default risk. Each asset has only two possible end-of-period states: default and non-default. In the event of default, the lender recovers a fixed proportion of the total expense. The default rate is considered as a continuous random variable. It does not try to estimate default correlation directly. Here, the default correlation is assumed to be determined by a set of risk factors. Conditional on these risk factors, default of each obligator follows a Bernoulli distribution. To get unconditional probability generating function for the number of defaults, it assumes that the risk factors are independently gamma distributed random variables. The final step in Creditrisk+ is to obtain the probability generating function for losses. Conditional on the number of default events, the losses are entirely determined by the exposure and recovery rate. Thus, the distribution of asset can be estimated from the fol lowing input data: i) Exposure of individual asset ii) Expected default rate iii) Default ate volatilities iv) Recovery rate given default 3.3 CREDIT PRICING Pricing of the credit is essential for the survival of enterprises relying on credit assets, because the benefits derived from extending credit should surpass the cost. With the introduction of capital adequacy norms, the credit risk is linked to the capital-minimum 8% capital adequacy. Consequently, higher capital is required to be deployed if more credit risks are underwritten. The decision (a) whether to maximize the returns on possible credit assets with the existing capital or (b) raise more capital to do more business invariably depends upon p Credit Risk Dissertation Credit Risk Dissertation CREDIT RISK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The future of banking will undoubtedly rest on risk management dynamics. Only those banks that have efficient risk management system will survive in the market in the long run. The major cause of serious banking problems over the years continues to be directly related to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties, poor portfolio risk management, or a lack of attention to deterioration in the credit standing of a banks counterparties. Credit risk is the oldest and biggest risk that bank, by virtue of its very nature of business, inherits. This has however, acquired a greater significance in the recent past for various reasons. There have been many traditional approaches to measure credit risk like logit, linear probability model but with passage of time new approaches have been developed like the Credit+, KMV Model. Basel I Accord was introduced in 1988 to have a framework for regulatory capital for banks but the â€Å"one size fit all† approach led to a shift, to a new and comprehensive approach -Basel II which adopts a three pillar approach to risk management. Banks use a number of techniques to mitigate the credit risks to which they are exposed. RBI has prescribed adoption of comprehensive approach for the purpose of CRM which allows fuller offset of security of collateral against exposures by effectively reducing the exposure amount by the value ascribed to the collateral. In this study, a leading nationalized bank is taken to study the steps taken by the bank to implement the Basel- II Accord and the entire framework developed for credit risk management. The bank under the study uses the credit scoring method to evaluate the credit risk involved in various loans/advances. The bank has set up special software to evaluate each case under various parameters and a monitoring system to continuously track each assets performance in accordance with the evaluation parameters. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Rationale Credit Risk Management in todays deregulated market is a big challenge. Increased market volatility has brought with it the need for smart analysis and specialized applications in managing credit risk. A well defined policy framework is needed to help the operating staff identify the risk-event, assign a probability to each, quantify the likely loss, assess the acceptability of the exposure, price the risk and monitor them right to the point where they are paid off. Generally, Banks in India evaluate a proposal through the traditional tools of project financing, computing maximum permissible limits, assessing management capabilities and prescribing a ceiling for an industry exposure. As banks move in to a new high powered world of financial operations and trading, with new risks, the need is felt for more sophisticated and versatile instruments for risk assessment, monitoring and controlling risk exposures. It is, therefore, time that banks managements equip them fully to grapple with the demands of creating tools and systems capable of assessing, monitoring and controlling risk exposures in a more scientific manner. According to an estimate, Credit Risk takes about 70% and 30% remaining is shared between the other two primary risks, namely Market risk (change in the market price and operational risk i.e., failure of internal controls, etc.). Quality borrowers (Tier-I borrowers) were able to access the capital market directly without going through the debt route. Hence, the credit route is now more open to lesser mortals (Tier-II borrowers). With margin levels going down, banks are unable to absorb the level of loan losses. Even in banks which regularly fine-tune credit policies and streamline credit processes, it is a real challenge for credit risk managers to correctly identify pockets of risk concentration, quantify extent of risk carried, identify opportunities for diversification and balance the risk-return trade-off in their credit portfolio. The management of banks should strive to embrace the notion of ‘uncertainty and risk in their balance sheet and instill the need for approaching credit administration from a ‘risk-perspective across the system by placing well drafted strategies in the hands of the operating staff with due material support for its successful implementation. There is a need for Strategic approach to Credit Risk Management (CRM) in Indian Commercial Banks, particularly in view of; (1) Higher NPAs level in comparison with global benchmark (2) RBI s stipulation about dividend distribution by the banks (3) Revised NPAs level and CAR norms (4) New Basel Capital Accord (Basel -II) revolution 1.2 OBJECTIVES To understand the conceptual framework for credit risk. To understand credit risk under the Basel II Accord. To analyze the credit risk management practices in a Leading Nationalised Bank 1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research Design: In order to have more comprehensive definition of the problem and to become familiar with the problems, an extensive literature survey was done to collect secondary data for the location of the various variables, probably contemporary issues and the clarity of concepts. Data Collection Techniques: The data collection technique used is interviewing. Data has been collected from both primary and secondary sources. Primary Data: is collected by making personal visits to the bank. Secondary Data: The details have been collected from research papers, working papers, white papers published by various agencies like ICRA, FICCI, IBA etc; articles from the internet and various journals. 1.4 LITERATURE REVIEW * Merton (1974) has applied options pricing model as a technology to evaluate the credit risk of enterprise, it has been drawn a lot of attention from western academic and business circles.Mertons Model is the theoretical foundation of structural models. Mertons model is not only based on a strict and comprehensive theory but also used market information stock price as an important variance toevaluate the credit risk.This makes credit risk to be a real-time monitored at a much higher frequency.This advantage has made it widely applied by the academic and business circle for a long time. Other Structural Models try to refine the original Merton Framework by removing one or more of unrealistic assumptions. * Black and Cox (1976) postulate that defaults occur as soon as firms asset value falls below a certain threshold. In contrast to the Merton approach, default can occur at any time. The paper by Black and Cox (1976) is the first of the so-called First Passage Models (FPM). First passage models specify default as the first time the firms asset value hits a lower barrier, allowing default to take place at any time. When the default barrier is exogenously fixed, as in Black and Cox (1976) and Longstaff and Schwartz (1995), it acts as a safety covenant to protect bondholders. Black and Cox introduce the possibility of more complex capital structures, with subordinated debt. * Geske (1977) introduces interest-paying debt to the Merton model. * Vasicek (1984) introduces the distinction between short and long term liabilities which now represents a distinctive feature of the KMV model. Under these models, all the relevant credit risk elements, including default and recovery at default, are a function of the structural characteristics of the firm: asset levels, asset volatility (business risk) and leverage (financial risk). * Kim, Ramaswamy and Sundaresan (1993) have suggested an alternative approach which still adopts the original Merton framework as far as the default process is concerned but, at the same time, removes one of the unrealistic assumptions of the Merton model; namely, that default can occur only at maturity of the debt when the firms assets are no longer sufficient to cover debt obligations. Instead, it is assumed that default may occur anytime between the issuance and maturity of the debt and that default is triggered when the value of the firms assets reaches a lower threshold level. In this model, the RR in the event of default is exogenous and independent from the firms asset value. It is generally defined as a fixed ratio of the outstanding debt value and is therefore independent from the PD. The attempt to overcome the shortcomings of structural-form models gave rise to reduced-form models. Unlike structural-form models, reduced-form models do not condition default on the value of the firm, and parameters related to the firms value need not be estimated to implement them. * Jarrow and Turnbull (1995) assumed that, at default, a bond would have a market value equal to an exogenously specified fraction of an otherwise equivalent default-free bond. * Duffie and Singleton (1999) followed with a model that, when market value at default (i.e. RR) is exogenously specified, allows for closed-form solutions for the term-structure of credit spreads. * Zhou (2001) attempt to combine the advantages of structural-form models a clear economic mechanism behind the default process, and the ones of reduced- form models unpredictability of default. This model links RRs to the firm value at default so that the variation in RRs is endogenously generated and the correlation between RRs and credit ratings reported first in Altman (1989) and Gupton, Gates and Carty (2000) is justified. Lately portfolio view on credit losses has emerged by recognising that changes in credit quality tend to comove over the business cycle and that one can diversify part of the credit risk by a clever composition of the loan portfolio across regions, industries and countries. Thus in order to assess the credit risk of a loan portfolio, a bank must not only investigate the creditworthiness of its customers, but also identify the concentration risks and possible comovements of risk factors in the portfolio. * CreditMetrics by Gupton et al (1997) was publicized in 1997 by JP Morgan. Its methodology is based on probability of moving from one credit quality to another within a given time horizon (credit migration analysis). The estimation of the portfolio Value-at-Risk due to Credit (Credit-VaR) through CreditMetrics A rating system with probabilities of migrating from one credit quality to another over a given time horizon (transition matrix) is the key component of the credit-VaR proposed by JP Morgan. The specified credit risk horizon is usually one year. A rating system with probabilities of migrating from one credit quality to another over a given time horizon (transition matrix) is the key component of the credit-VaR proposed by JP Morgan. The specified credit risk horizon is usually one year. * (Sy, 2007), states that the primary cause of credit default is loan delinquency due to insufficient liquidity or cash flow to service debt obligations. In the case of unsecured loans, we assume delinquency is a necessary and sufficient condition. In the case of collateralized loans, delinquency is a necessary, but not sufficient condition, because the borrower may be able to refinance the loan from positive equity or net assets to prevent default. In general, for secured loans, both delinquency and insolvency are assumed necessary and sufficient for credit default. CHAPTER 2 THEORECTICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 CREDIT RISK: Credit risk is risk due to uncertainty in a counterpartys (also called an obligors or credits) ability to meet its obligations. Because there are many types of counterparties—from individuals to sovereign governments—and many different types of obligations—from auto loans to derivatives transactions—credit risk takes many forms. Institutions manage it in different ways. Although credit losses naturally fluctuate over time and with economic conditions, there is (ceteris paribus) a statistically measured, long-run average loss level. The losses can be divided into two categories i.e. expected losses (EL) and unexpected losses (UL). EL is based on three parameters:  ·Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚   The likelihood that default will take place over a specified time horizon (probability of default or PD)  · â‚ ¬Ã‚  The amount owned by the counterparty at the moment of default (exposure at default or EAD)  ·Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚   The fraction of the exposure, net of any recoveries, which will be lost following a default event (loss given default or LGD). EL = PD x EAD x LGD EL can be aggregated at various different levels (e.g. individual loan or entire credit portfolio), although it is typically calculated at the transaction level; it is normally mentioned either as an absolute amount or as a percentage of transaction size. It is also both customer- and facility-specific, since two different loans to the same customer can have a very different EL due to differences in EAD and/or LGD. It is important to note that EL (or, for that matter, credit quality) does not by itself constitute risk; if losses always equaled their expected levels, then there would be no uncertainty. Instead, EL should be viewed as an anticipated â€Å"cost of doing business† and should therefore be incorporated in loan pricing and ex ante provisioning. Credit risk, in fact, arises from variations in the actual loss levels, which give rise to the so-called unexpected loss (UL). Statistically speaking, UL is simply the standard deviation of EL. UL= ÏÆ' (EL) = ÏÆ' (PD*EAD*LGD) Once the bank- level credit loss distribution is constructed, credit economic capital is simply determined by the banks tolerance for credit risk, i.e. the bank needs to decide how much capital it wants to hold in order to avoid insolvency because of unexpected credit losses over the next year. A safer bank must have sufficient capital to withstand losses that are larger and rarer, i.e. they extend further out in the loss distribution tail. In practice, therefore, the choice of confidence interval in the loss distribution corresponds to the banks target credit rating (and related default probability) for its own debt. As Figure below shows, economic capital is the difference between EL and the selected confidence interval at the tail of the loss distribution; it is equal to a multiple K (often referred to as the capital multiplier) of the standard deviation of EL (i.e. UL). The shape of the loss distribution can vary considerably depending on product type and borrower credit quality. For example, high quality (low PD) borrowers tend to have proportionally less EL per unit of capital charged, meaning that K is higher and the shape of their loss distribution is more skewed (and vice versa). Credit risk may be in the following forms: * In case of the direct lending * In case of the guarantees and the letter of the credit * In case of the treasury operations * In case of the securities trading businesses * In case of the cross border exposure 2.2 The need for Credit Risk Rating: The need for Credit Risk Rating has arisen due to the following: 1. With dismantling of State control, deregulation, globalisation and allowing things to shape on the basis of market conditions, Indian Industry and Indian Banking face new risks and challenges. Competition results in the survival of the fittest. It is therefore necessary to identify these risks, measure them, monitor and control them. 2. It provides a basis for Credit Risk Pricing i.e. fixation of rate of interest on lending to different borrowers based on their credit risk rating thereby balancing Risk Reward for the Bank. 3. The Basel Accord and consequent Reserve Bank of India guidelines requires that the level of capital required to be maintained by the Bank will be in proportion to the risk of the loan in Banks Books for measurement of which proper Credit Risk Rating system is necessary. 4. The credit risk rating can be a Risk Management tool for prospecting fresh borrowers in addition to monitoring the weaker parameters and taking remedial action. The types of Risks Captured in the Banks Credit Risk Rating Model The Credit Risk Rating Model provides a framework to evaluate the risk emanating from following main risk categorizes/risk areas: * Industry risk * Business risk * Financial risk * Management risk * Facility risk * Project risk 2.3 WHY CREDIT RISK MEASUREMENT? In recent years, a revolution is brewing in risk as it is both managed and measured. There are seven reasons as to why certain surge in interest: 1. Structural increase in bankruptcies: Although the most recent recession hit at different time in different countries, most statistics show a significant increase in bankruptcies, compared to prior recession. To the extent that there has been a permanent or structural increase in bankruptcies worldwide- due to increase in the global competition- accurate credit analysis become even more important today than in past. 2. Disintermediation: As capital markets have expanded and become accessible to small and mid sized firms, the firms or borrowers â€Å"left behind† to raise funds from banks and other traditional financial institutions (FIs) are likely to be smaller and to have weaker credit ratings. Capital market growth has produced â€Å"a winners† curse effect on the portfolios of traditional FIs. 3. More Competitive Margins: Almost paradoxically, despite the decline in the average quality of loans, interest margins or spreads, especially in wholesale loan markets have become very thin. In short, the risk-return trade off from lending has gotten worse. A number of reasons can be cited, but an important factor has been the enhanced competition for low quality borrowers especially from finance companies, much of whose lending activity has been concentrated at the higher risk/lower quality end of the market. 4. Declining and Volatile Values of Collateral: Concurrent with the recent Asian and Russian debt crisis in well developed countries such as Switzerland and Japan have shown that property and real assets value are very hard to predict, and to realize through liquidation. The weaker (and more uncertain) collateral values are, the riskier the lending is likely to be. Indeed the current concerns about deflation worldwide have been accentuated the concerns about the value of real assets such as property and other physical assets. 5. The Growth Of Off- Balance Sheet Derivatives: In many of the very large U.S. banks, the notional value of the off-balance-sheet exposure to instruments such as over-the-counter (OTC) swaps and forwards is more than 10 times the size of their loan books. Indeed the growth in credit risk off the balance sheet was one of the main reasons for the introduction, by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), of risk based capital requirements in 1993. Under the BIS system, the banks have to hold a capital requirement based on the mark- to- market current values of each OTC Derivative contract plus an add on for potential future exposure. 6. Technology Advances in computer systems and related advances in information technology have given banks and FIs the opportunity to test high powered modeling techniques. A survey conducted by International Swaps and Derivatives Association and the Institute of International Finance in 2000 found that survey participants (consisting of 25 commercial banks from 10 countries, with varying size and specialties) used commercial and internal databases to assess the credit risk on rated and unrated commercial, retail and mortgage loans. 7. The BIS Risk-Based Capital Requirements Despite the importance of above six reasons, probably the greatest incentive for banks to develop new credit risk models has been dissatisfaction with the BIS and central banks post-1992 imposition of capital requirements on loans. The current BIS approach has been described as a ‘one size fits all policy, irrespective of the size of loan, its maturity, and most importantly, the credit quality of the borrowing party. Much of the current interest in fine tuning credit risk measurement models has been fueled by the proposed BIS New Capital Accord (or so Called BIS II) which would more closely link capital charges to the credit risk exposure to retail, commercial, sovereign and interbank credits. Chapter- 3 Credit Risk Approaches and Pricing 3.1 CREDIT RISK MEASUREMENT APPROACHES: 1. CREDIT SCORING MODELS Credit Scoring Models use data on observed borrower characteristics to calculate the probability of default or to sort borrowers into different default risk classes. By selecting and combining different economic and financial borrower characteristics, a bank manager may be able to numerically establish which factors are important in explaining default risk, evaluate the relative degree or importance of these factors, improve the pricing of default risk, be better able to screen out bad loan applicants and be in a better position to calculate any reserve needed to meet expected future loan losses. To employ credit scoring model in this manner, the manager must identify objective economic and financial measures of risk for any particular class of borrower. For consumer debt, the objective characteristics in a credit -scoring model might include income, assets, age occupation and location. For corporate debt, financial ratios such as debt-equity ratio are usually key factors. After data are identified, a statistical technique quantifies or scores the default risk probability or default risk classification. Credit scoring models include three broad types: (1) linear probability models, (2) logit model and (3) linear discriminant model. LINEAR PROBABILITY MODEL: The linear probability model uses past data, such as accounting ratios, as inputs into a model to explain repayment experience on old loans. The relative importance of the factors used in explaining the past repayment performance then forecasts repayment probabilities on new loans; that is can be used for assessing the probability of repayment. Briefly we divide old loans (i) into two observational groups; those that defaulted (Zi = 1) and those that did not default (Zi = 0). Then we relate these observations by linear regression to s set of j casual variables (Xij) that reflects quantative information about the ith borrower, such as leverage or earnings. We estimate the model by linear regression of: Zi = ÃŽ £ÃŽ ²jXij + error Where ÃŽ ²j is the estimated importance of the jth variable in explaining past repayment experience. If we then take these estimated ÃŽ ²js and multiply them by the observed Xij for a prospective borrower, we can derive an expected value of Zi for the probability of repayment on the loan. LOGIT MODEL: The objective of the typical credit or loan review model is to replicate judgments made by loan officers, credit managers or bank examiners. If an accurate model could be developed, then it could be used as a tool for reviewing and classifying future credit risks. Chesser (1974) developed a model to predict noncompliance with the customers original loan arrangement, where non-compliance is defined to include not only default but any workout that may have been arranged resulting in a settlement of the loan less favorable to the tender than the original agreement. Chessers model, which was based on a technique called logit analysis, consisted of the following six variables. X1 = (Cash + Marketable Securities)/Total Assets X2 = Net Sales/(Cash + Marketable Securities) X3 = EBIT/Total Assets X4 = Total Debt/Total Assets X5 = Total Assets/ Net Worth X6 = Working Capital/Net Sales The estimated coefficients, including an intercept term, are Y = -2.0434 -5.24X1 + 0.0053X2 6.6507X3 + 4.4009X4 0.0791X5 0.1020X6 Chessers classification rule for above equation is If P> 50, assign to the non compliance group and If P≠¤50, assign to the compliance group. LINEAR DISCRIMINANT MODEL: While linear probability and logit models project a value foe the expected probability of default if a loan is made, discriminant models divide borrowers into high or default risk classes contingent on their observed characteristic (X). Altmans Z-score model is an application of multivariate Discriminant analysis in credit risk modeling. Financial ratios measuring probability, liquidity and solvency appeared to have significant discriminating power to separate the firm that fails to service its debt from the firms that do not. These ratios are weighted to produce a measure (credit risk score) that can be used as a metric to differentiate the bad firms from the set of good ones. Discriminant analysis is a multivariate statistical technique that analyzes a set of variables in order to differentiate two or more groups by minimizing the within-group variance and maximizing the between group variance simultaneously. Variables taken were: X1::Working Capital/ Total Asset X2: Retained Earning/ Total Asset X3: Earning before interest and taxes/ Total Asset X4: Market value of equity/ Book value of total Liabilities X5: Sales/Total Asset The original Z-score model was revised and modified several times in order to find the scoring model more specific to a particular class of firm. These resulted in the private firms Z-score model, non manufacturers Z-score model and Emerging Market Scoring (EMS) model. 3.2 New Approaches TERM STRUCTURE DERIVATION OF CREDIT RISK: One market based method of assessing credit risk exposure and default probabilities is to analyze the risk premium inherent in the current structure of yields on corporate debt or loans to similar risk-rated borrowers. Rating agencies categorize corporate bond issuers into at least seven major classes according to perceived credit quality. The first four ratings AAA, AA, A and BBB indicate investment quality borrowers. MORTALITY RATE APPROACH: Rather than extracting expected default rates from the current term structure of interest rates, the FI manager may analyze the historic or past default experience the mortality rates, of bonds and loans of a similar quality. Here p1is the probability of a grade B bond surviving the first year of its issue; thus 1 p1 is the marginal mortality rate, or the probability of the bond or loan dying or defaulting in the first year while p2 is the probability of the loan surviving in the second year and that it has not defaulted in the first year, 1-p2 is the marginal mortality rate for the second year. Thus, for each grade of corporate buyer quality, a marginal mortality rate (MMR) curve can show the historical default rate in any specific quality class in each year after issue. RAROC MODELS: Based on a banks risk-bearing capacity and its risk strategy, it is thus necessary — bearing in mind the banks strategic orientation — to find a method for the efficient allocation of capital to the banks individual siness areas, i.e. to define indicators that are suitable for balancing risk and return in a sensible manner. Indicators fulfilling this requirement are often referred to as risk adjusted performance measures (RAPM). RARORAC (risk adjusted return on risk adjusted capital, usually abbreviated as the most commonly found forms are RORAC (return on risk adjusted capital), Net income is taken to mean income minus refinancing cost, operating cost, and expected losses. It should now be the banks goal to maximize a RAPM indicator for the bank as a whole, e.g. RORAC, taking into account the correlation between individual transactions. Certain constraints such as volume restrictions due to a potential lack of liquidity and the maintenance of solvency based on economic and regulatory capital have to be observed in reaching this goal. From an organizational point of view, value and risk management should therefore be linked as closely as possible at all organizational levels. OPTION MODELS OF DEFAULT RISK (kmv model): KMV Corporation has developed a credit risk model that uses information on the stock prices and the capital structure of the firm to estimate its default probability. The starting point of the model is the proposition that a firm will default only if its asset value falls below a certain level, which is function of its liability. It estimates the asset value of the firm and its asset volatility from the market value of equity and the debt structure in the option theoretic framework. The resultant probability is called Expected default Frequency (EDF). In summary, EDF is calculated in the following three steps: i) Estimation of asset value and volatility from the equity value and volatility of equity return. ii) Calculation of distance from default iii) Calculation of expected default frequency Credit METRICS: It provides a method for estimating the distribution of the value of the assets n a portfolio subject to change in the credit quality of individual borrower. A portfolio consists of different stand-alone assets, defined by a stream of future cash flows. Each asset has a distribution over the possible range of future rating class. Starting from its initial rating, an asset may end up in ay one of the possible rating categories. Each rating category has a different credit spread, which will be used to discount the future cash flows. Moreover, the assets are correlated among themselves depending on the industry they belong to. It is assumed that the asset returns are normally distributed and change in the asset returns causes the change in the rating category in future. Finally, the simulation technique is used to estimate the value distribution of the assets. A number of scenario are generated from a multivariate normal distribution, which is defined by the appropriate credit spread, t he future value of asset is estimated. CREDIT Risk+: CreditRisk+, introduced by Credit Suisse Financial Products (CSFP), is a model of default risk. Each asset has only two possible end-of-period states: default and non-default. In the event of default, the lender recovers a fixed proportion of the total expense. The default rate is considered as a continuous random variable. It does not try to estimate default correlation directly. Here, the default correlation is assumed to be determined by a set of risk factors. Conditional on these risk factors, default of each obligator follows a Bernoulli distribution. To get unconditional probability generating function for the number of defaults, it assumes that the risk factors are independently gamma distributed random variables. The final step in Creditrisk+ is to obtain the probability generating function for losses. Conditional on the number of default events, the losses are entirely determined by the exposure and recovery rate. Thus, the distribution of asset can be estimated from the fol lowing input data: i) Exposure of individual asset ii) Expected default rate iii) Default ate volatilities iv) Recovery rate given default 3.3 CREDIT PRICING Pricing of the credit is essential for the survival of enterprises relying on credit assets, because the benefits derived from extending credit should surpass the cost. With the introduction of capital adequacy norms, the credit risk is linked to the capital-minimum 8% capital adequacy. Consequently, higher capital is required to be deployed if more credit risks are underwritten. The decision (a) whether to maximize the returns on possible credit assets with the existing capital or (b) raise more capital to do more business invariably depends upon p

Revenge in Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter Essays -- Scarlet Letter es

The Scarlet Letter:   Revenge    Revenge is the act of retaliating in order to get even with someone for the wrongs they have done. In the novel â€Å"The Scarlet Letter,† the author, Nathaniel Hawthorne, uses Roger Chillingworth to reap revenge on Arthur Dimmesdale for his affair with his wife, Hester Prynne. Chillingworth becomes so devoted to revenge that is all his life revolves around. Chillingworth then devotes the rest of his life to taking revenge on Dimmesdale. As the novel progressed, Chillingworth fits the profile of ‘vengeance destroys the avenger’. When Roger Chillingworth is first introduced to the reader, we see a kind old man, who just has planted the seeds for revenge. Although he did speak of getting his revenge, when Hester first met her husband in her jail cell, she did not see any evil in him. Because Hester would not tell him who she had slept with, Chillingworth vowed that he would spend the rest of his life having his revenge and that he would eventually suck the soul out of the man, whom she had the affair with. â€Å"There is a sympathy that will make me conscious of him. I shall see him tremble. I shall feel myself shudder, suddenly and unawares† (Hawthorne, 101) As the novel develops, Roger Chillingworth has centered himself on Arthur Dimmesdale, but he cannot prove that he is the â€Å"one.† Chillingworth has become friends with Dimmesdale, because he has a â€Å"strange disease,† that n eeded to be cured; Chillingworth suspects something and begins to drill Dimmesdale. â€Å"†¦ The disorder is a strange one†¦hath all the operation of this disorder been fairly laid open to me and recounted to me† (Hawthorne, 156). As Chillingworth continues to drill Dimmesdale, he strikes a nerve. â€Å"You deal not, I take it, i... ...Now go thy ways, and deal as thou wilt with yonder man† (Hawthorne, 192). Chillingworth’s plan for revenge is based on Dimmesdale not confessing to his crime. When Dimmesdale confessed to the crowd on Election Day, Chillingworth pleaded with him not to tell. â€Å"Old Roger Chillingworth knelt down beside him, with a blank, dull countenance, out of which life seemed to have departed. Thou hast escaped me†¦thou hast escaped me! He repeated more than once.† (Hawthorne, 268). Once Dimmesdale had confessed and died, Chillingworth had nothing to live for. â€Å"At old Roger Chillingworth’s decease (which took place within the year).† (Hawthorne, 272). Revenge destroys the avenger, fits the life of Roger Chillingworth. He devoted his entire life to revenge, and what happiness did he have to show for it? Had Chillingworth not been so jealous, he might have had a better life to live.

Frost :: essays research papers

Robert Frost: Biography and Review   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Robert Lee Frost, b. San Francisco, Mar. 26, 1874 d. Boston, Jan. 29, 1963, was one of the leading poets of the 20th-century and a four time winner of the Pulitzer Prize. Frost was a poet often associated with rural New England, although his poems could be felt and related to in any region of the world. Thought his younger days may have not been filled with other children having fun and such, Frost made the best of what he enjoyed. At the young age of only eleven Frost’s father passed away. Soon after his death the family left California to settle in Massachusetts. As young Frost grew-up he attended high school in that state, later would enter Dartmouth College, but would remain there less that one semester. Later he returned to Massachusetts where he would be a school teacher along with two other jobs he held as a mill worker and a newspaper reporter.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Then in 1895 Frost married Elinor White whom he had been co-valedictorians with in high school. Then between 1897 and 1899 Frost felt the need to go back to college he attended Harvard as a special student only to leave without a degree. Over the next ten years he would write more poetry. Frost would live on and operate a farm in Derry, New Hampshire that his grandfather had purchase for him with the condition he live there for a minimum of ten years. He would also take a teaching position at Derry’s Pinkerton Academy to receive another form of income. Frost would not stay there long, as he felt the need to once again move.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In 1912, when Frost was nearly forty he sold the farm and used the proceeds to take his family to England, where he could devote himself entirely to writing. Frost would establish himself quickly and would reap the awards of immediate success. In 1894 at the age of twenty Frost sold and published his first poem “My Butterfly:An Elegy'; to The Independent, a New York literary journal. This was his first step in the long line of success that he would encounter. Only a year after Frost arrived in England his book “A Boy’s Will'; was accepted and published. With the help of favorable reviews on both sided of the Atlantic a American publisher published his book. The Henry Holt and Company became Frosts primary American Publisher. Frost :: essays research papers Robert Frost: Biography and Review   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Robert Lee Frost, b. San Francisco, Mar. 26, 1874 d. Boston, Jan. 29, 1963, was one of the leading poets of the 20th-century and a four time winner of the Pulitzer Prize. Frost was a poet often associated with rural New England, although his poems could be felt and related to in any region of the world. Thought his younger days may have not been filled with other children having fun and such, Frost made the best of what he enjoyed. At the young age of only eleven Frost’s father passed away. Soon after his death the family left California to settle in Massachusetts. As young Frost grew-up he attended high school in that state, later would enter Dartmouth College, but would remain there less that one semester. Later he returned to Massachusetts where he would be a school teacher along with two other jobs he held as a mill worker and a newspaper reporter.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Then in 1895 Frost married Elinor White whom he had been co-valedictorians with in high school. Then between 1897 and 1899 Frost felt the need to go back to college he attended Harvard as a special student only to leave without a degree. Over the next ten years he would write more poetry. Frost would live on and operate a farm in Derry, New Hampshire that his grandfather had purchase for him with the condition he live there for a minimum of ten years. He would also take a teaching position at Derry’s Pinkerton Academy to receive another form of income. Frost would not stay there long, as he felt the need to once again move.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In 1912, when Frost was nearly forty he sold the farm and used the proceeds to take his family to England, where he could devote himself entirely to writing. Frost would establish himself quickly and would reap the awards of immediate success. In 1894 at the age of twenty Frost sold and published his first poem “My Butterfly:An Elegy'; to The Independent, a New York literary journal. This was his first step in the long line of success that he would encounter. Only a year after Frost arrived in England his book “A Boy’s Will'; was accepted and published. With the help of favorable reviews on both sided of the Atlantic a American publisher published his book. The Henry Holt and Company became Frosts primary American Publisher.

Grapes of Wrath :: essays papers

Grapes of Wrath The Grapes of Wrath There's an old saying, "Blood is thicker than water." Well, nothing proves truer than the families in The Grapes of Wrath. When faced with hardships, people leaned on their kin for support and love, and in the worst of times would even turn their backs on those they had known for years to protect and provide for their families: ...Can't think of that. Got to think of my own kids. Three dollars a day, and it comes every day. Times are changing, mister, don't you know? Can't make a living on the land unless you've got two, five, ten thousand acres and a tractor. Crop land isn't for little guys like us any more. You don't kick up a fowl because you can't make Fords, or because you're not the telephone company. Nothing to do about it. You try to get three dollars a day someplace. That's the only way. (50) The Joad family is no exception. Their trials, tribulations, and broken dreams while suffering through the harsh realities of a fallen America only bring them closer together and remind the reader of true family values. When the reader is first introduced to the Joads, as a full family, one can sense the love immediately. "[Ma] moved towards [Tom] lithely, soundlessly...And her joy was almost like sorrow (101)." Even though she hasn't seen him for quite some time, and that may be the initial reason for her wonderment, she truely loves Tom and Steinbeck does an excellent job of portraying the emotions involved. Even when Granma and Granpa come into the house, the same emotions are evident, although the actions are quite opposite. Granma repeatedly "pu-raise[s] Gawd," while Granpa "walk[s] up and slap[s] Tom, [with] his eyes grinn[ing] with affection and pride." The reader knows the Joads can hold love for a person no matter how long he's been gone, or where he's been (and in this case, prison). Former Reverend Jim Casy is even accepted as one of their own when he arrives with Tom at Uncle John's house. Ma makes sure there is room on the truck for him and Tom calls him over as if he were one of the men in the family. "[Casy] knew the government of families, and he knew he had been taken